Articles for presentation:
1. The IMF is hurting poor countries:
I found this article on the guardian.co.uk website. It was written by Mark Weisbrot and published on Wednesday 13 May 2009.
The article talkes about the issue that many developing countries face when they try to borrow money from the IMF. The IMF usually places loan conditionalities on the borrowing country which can be seen as requirement that the country has to fullfil in order to receive the disbursement.A recent example is Latvia which missed a 200 million Euro disbursement, because it could not reduce its budget deficit to 5% of its GDP for this year as required by the IMF. The country is not desperately trying to meet the goals set by the IMF by closing public hospitals and schools, however this attempt prompts street protests.In Washington, politicians are planning to equip the IMF with an 108 bn appropriation in order to help developing countries.
2. The bank the world needs
I also found this article on the guardian.co.uk website. It was written by Nancy Birdsell and published on Thursday 3 May 2007.
The article talks about the fact that the World Bank right now is not able to address and tackle global issues, because it lacks the mandate and the financial instruments. Therefore, the member governments have to sit together in order to rethink the role of the bank and make it a strong and effective institution that the world needs. The article states that the global economy does not need a new institution, because the World Bank has great potential. It has two key strengths. The first one is its solid expertise which is highly valued by many countries and secondly its ability to provide global public goods. Therefore, it is up to the member countries to make effective use of the World Bank.
3. Collateral Damage
I found this article on the nytimes.com site. The article appeared in the editorial and was published on 19 October 2008.
The article focuses on the third world countries which have also become victims of the financial crisis. However, this is not the countries fault as their domestic economies are heavily dependent on rich countries’ economies which means that an economic slowdown in the world’s richest countries has considerable effect on developing countries as well. That’s why the rich countries should be prepared to provide rescue money to poorer countries that did not actually cause the crisis, yet have been hit hard as well.
Montag, 18. Mai 2009
Dienstag, 12. Mai 2009
Globalization and its discontent
Globalization and its discontents by Joseph Stiglitz
In his book, the former chief economist of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, takes a very critical look at globalization. Based on his experience in the world economy, he tries to eradicate the wide-spread view that globalization only brang about positive things such as an improvement in the standard of living of people or the alleviation of poverty only to name a few. In his study, Stiglitz focuses on the failures of globalization and speaking of those introduces three world organizations , the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO, which he consideres as the driving forces behind the failures being committed.While hopes for development of third world countries were high, reality has turned out to be cruel and relentless. Contrary to all the promises of alleviating poverty and raising the standard of living in developing countries, globalization has actually caused the chasm between rich and poor to increase. Furthermore, the countries which indeed profit from open trade and free market policies are the rich and industrialized countries whereas poor countries have to suffer even more and burden the externalized costs produced by the West. Stiglitz believes that the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO’s policies hinder developing countries from building up a growing and healthy economy. Those institutions which were put in place to assist developing countries in that transition process do not act as representatives of their interests. Coupled with loans are usually extensive conditionalities which the borrowing country has to commit to in order to receive the loan. These loan conditionlaties tend to be very demanding and especially witnessed at the example of African countries such as Ethopia have proven to be devastating for the prevalence of democracy and local economic growth. On the other hand, they allowed for the enrichement of multinational corporations. The IMF’s response to economic development was the idea of a market economy, without the installment of institutions to ensure the protection of local businesses. The IMF urged developing countries to liberalize their local markets causing their economies to destabilize by massive inflows of short-term investment capital. Inflation followed causing dramatically rising interest rates. As a result widespread bankruptcies were on the agenda, followed by massive unemployment and the prompt withdrawal of foreign capital. Left alone to deal with the economic disaster, the countries also have to cope with social unrests, famines and contaminations due to infectious diseases.The author decries that the IMF and the World Bank’s policies are driven by rich countries’ greed and striving for profits which greatly exceed their social awareness of third world countries which are in need for development.On the other hand, Stiglitz gives examples of countries which successfully managed the transition from a developing to a growing economy. China and South Asia, nowadays the two greatest emerging markets, resisted IMF conditions and declined any of its money. The author views South Asia’s denial of aid from the IMF as key to a successful development.In spite of the fact that globalization has not kept many of its promises, Joseph Stiglitz believes that globalizaton can in fact bring about positive change and enrich everyone in the world, even the poor. Yet, he emphasizes that it is fundamental to rethink the approach and the ideas used to manage globalization. Therefore, it goes without saying that a change in the structure of the IMF, World Bank and WTO is unavoidable. In the past, these institutions have abused their exclusive rights and priviliges which had devastating consequences for many developing countries and the environment. Stiglitz argues for a reform of the IMF and the World Bank as they lack accountability and transparency. These obscure organizations made arguable decisions to overcome legal barriers which helped them to realize the idea of rapid market liberalization. Furthermore, the author demands the extension of voting rights to developing countries which are clearly underrepresented among the member countries. Given the present global situation marked by problems like overpopulation, pandemics and economic disasters, the need for equitable growth is more urgent now than ever. The methods and approaches taken to tackle these problems should be specific for every developing country. Change has to happen gradually and selective policies should be adopted which would meet and benefit an individual country’s needs. According to Stiglitz, it is even more important to promote the prevalence of democracy which he consideres the base for successful development. A strong political background is the solid fundament for a country’s aim to achieve economic growth and development.
In his book, the former chief economist of the World Bank, Joseph Stiglitz, takes a very critical look at globalization. Based on his experience in the world economy, he tries to eradicate the wide-spread view that globalization only brang about positive things such as an improvement in the standard of living of people or the alleviation of poverty only to name a few. In his study, Stiglitz focuses on the failures of globalization and speaking of those introduces three world organizations , the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO, which he consideres as the driving forces behind the failures being committed.While hopes for development of third world countries were high, reality has turned out to be cruel and relentless. Contrary to all the promises of alleviating poverty and raising the standard of living in developing countries, globalization has actually caused the chasm between rich and poor to increase. Furthermore, the countries which indeed profit from open trade and free market policies are the rich and industrialized countries whereas poor countries have to suffer even more and burden the externalized costs produced by the West. Stiglitz believes that the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO’s policies hinder developing countries from building up a growing and healthy economy. Those institutions which were put in place to assist developing countries in that transition process do not act as representatives of their interests. Coupled with loans are usually extensive conditionalities which the borrowing country has to commit to in order to receive the loan. These loan conditionlaties tend to be very demanding and especially witnessed at the example of African countries such as Ethopia have proven to be devastating for the prevalence of democracy and local economic growth. On the other hand, they allowed for the enrichement of multinational corporations. The IMF’s response to economic development was the idea of a market economy, without the installment of institutions to ensure the protection of local businesses. The IMF urged developing countries to liberalize their local markets causing their economies to destabilize by massive inflows of short-term investment capital. Inflation followed causing dramatically rising interest rates. As a result widespread bankruptcies were on the agenda, followed by massive unemployment and the prompt withdrawal of foreign capital. Left alone to deal with the economic disaster, the countries also have to cope with social unrests, famines and contaminations due to infectious diseases.The author decries that the IMF and the World Bank’s policies are driven by rich countries’ greed and striving for profits which greatly exceed their social awareness of third world countries which are in need for development.On the other hand, Stiglitz gives examples of countries which successfully managed the transition from a developing to a growing economy. China and South Asia, nowadays the two greatest emerging markets, resisted IMF conditions and declined any of its money. The author views South Asia’s denial of aid from the IMF as key to a successful development.In spite of the fact that globalization has not kept many of its promises, Joseph Stiglitz believes that globalizaton can in fact bring about positive change and enrich everyone in the world, even the poor. Yet, he emphasizes that it is fundamental to rethink the approach and the ideas used to manage globalization. Therefore, it goes without saying that a change in the structure of the IMF, World Bank and WTO is unavoidable. In the past, these institutions have abused their exclusive rights and priviliges which had devastating consequences for many developing countries and the environment. Stiglitz argues for a reform of the IMF and the World Bank as they lack accountability and transparency. These obscure organizations made arguable decisions to overcome legal barriers which helped them to realize the idea of rapid market liberalization. Furthermore, the author demands the extension of voting rights to developing countries which are clearly underrepresented among the member countries. Given the present global situation marked by problems like overpopulation, pandemics and economic disasters, the need for equitable growth is more urgent now than ever. The methods and approaches taken to tackle these problems should be specific for every developing country. Change has to happen gradually and selective policies should be adopted which would meet and benefit an individual country’s needs. According to Stiglitz, it is even more important to promote the prevalence of democracy which he consideres the base for successful development. A strong political background is the solid fundament for a country’s aim to achieve economic growth and development.
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)